Hello! I've been lurking here for a while, but decided to make an account to see if I could get some assistance with a (very) small project.
When I'm not wearing my wedding band, I usually keep it on a cord around my neck. I'm not interested in a metal chain with a clasp ... such clasps can be fiddly and difficult to manipulate when wearing gloves or when your hands are wet/oily/dirty.
So first I tried a simple loop of cord with a figure eight knot to tie the ends together. Crude but effective. I put a bight of the loop through the ring and make a lark's head. The problem is that the lark's head can unravel in such a way that the ring will slip right off, even while cord is around my neck. I realized that this was because the loop was larger than the ring.
To fix this, I tied a second figure eight towards one end of the loop, effectively separating it into two parts: a small loop for the ring and a large loop for my neck. Now the lark's head can't unravel because the smaller end doesn't slip over and out of the ring. Hurrah!
As a budding knot enthusiast, aesthetics are important to me. While my current solution is both secure and functional, I couldn't help but notice that it uses TWO knots. This leads directly to my current problem:
I'd like to find a single secure, compact, and "pretty" knot that can divide a length of cord into two loops, one for the lark's head over the ring and one for my neck.
Secure, compact, and pretty are my primary goals in that order. So far the closest thing I've found is a "twice rethreaded" figure 8 knot:

It seems secure, and if it doesn't collapse under stress it should maintain its nice even appearance, but it's anything but compact. Is this the best bet for what I want to do, or is there a better knot for this purpose? For example, ABOK#1063 gives a nice, compact loop but it would still need an additional knot to secure the ends of the cord.
Alternately, is there an entirely different way to secure a ring to a lanyard that can be accomplished with only knots (without additional hardware)? Thanks!