Now I have examined various fig.8 bends, I see that the C - C bend, shown at (1), can be described as a two-interlocked-fig. 8 knots-bend more accurately than as a two-interlocked-overhand-knots bend. I post here some more pictures of this bend, for an easy comparison with the other previously posted fig.8 bends at this thread.
1) http://igkt.net/sm/index.php?topic=3086.msg18725#msg18725
"1)" Xarax, I find it a PITA to follow LINKS to get to what is
simply got by scrolling up the page of the current thread?
Why not just say "to the fig.8 bends above (post #x)" ?
Yes, it could be the case that a post gets deleted and the
re-numbered remainders then indicate an adjustment to
the reference; but deletions should really be a non-issue.

I canNOT make the "D"-2nd image be the same knot as the others:
it shows the orange tail CLEARLY crossing IN FRONT OF the
white; but the slight & 90deg rotations, respectively, of preceding
& succeeding images clearly show the tails in opposite place!?

Whatever, here and in some other of these knots, I think it might
be best to orient the tails such that the draw of the SParts pulls
them tighter, unlike the present cases where there is some potential
for an opposite, loosening action. [2nd edit to add : here, but for
this 2nd image, the tails ARE so oriented; in the 2nd image & others,
they are not.]
AND, although they are indeed fig.8 components, one can see
these knots as securings of the
Thief knot --taking the tails
into a simple wrap & tuck. And THIS should suggest that the
knots will be amenable to untying, esp. the one with the big
bowline-like collars (knot-C).
--dl*
====