Author Topic: "FRONT" Must be Changed!  (Read 6204 times)

SS369

  • Global Moderator
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2021
Re: "FRONT" Must be Changed!
« Reply #15 on: September 21, 2018, 12:47:10 AM »

Quote

--dl*
====

PS : THIS POST WAS UNDER PRACTICAL KNOTS
FOR THE REASON OF ADDRESSING THE >>MANY<< POST
BY YCHAN OF BOWLINES, LABELED "FRONT/BACK" SUCH
THAT IT PIQUED MY BARKING!   :o

AND ARE HIS KNOTS "PRACTICAL" OR "INVESTIGATIONS"?

No, this, your original post " "FRONT" Must be Changed!" was posted in the New Knot Investigations Board and which it there suggested it be moved here and I concurred.

agent_smith

  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1470
Re: "FRONT" Must be Changed!
« Reply #16 on: September 26, 2018, 02:45:33 AM »
Attached image is an example in support of the proposition that one perspective
of [a] 'Bowline' will usually facilitate easier observation of the nipping component.

It follows that, IF the nipping component is the key to understanding all Bowlines,
THEN, it is logical to show the side which emphasizes it.

I believe that this is the concept which underpins Dan Lehman's proposition.

 

anything