Hello all,
We have long made a practice of destruction-testing splices. Sometimes this is at the request of clients, particularly on the industrial side; sometimes we want to prove the skills of new employees; and sometimes we need to test new splices that we or others have come up with. The data isn't terribly significant without at least a few samples, so we try to get as many in as we can afford/find time to make.
In addition, of course, we check to make sure that our splicers are actually following the directions.
This could be considered as a basis for certification, and I have long hoped that we could have industry-wide standards on the subject. Yale's program is for Yale's rope only, of course, though their basic constructions might translate to other manufacturers' rope. But what I'm looking for is a set of parameters that could be applied to any rope. We'd need to establish the nominal strength of the rope to begin with, and this means getting meaningful information from the maker. Not always easy. Then we'd need independent testing from a reputable outfit. And then we'd need a central processing entity to record results and distribute certificates.
And it is the certificates that I'm after here, something to put on the wall to show clients that you care enough about the art to go to all that trouble.
The certification process could be extended to all sorts of rigging skills, including load calculations, vector analysis, measuring, specifying hardware, etc. And this letter might be considered an attempt to get this idea finally in motion; anybody have ideas on how to proceed? Might this Guild be in the mix? Rigging is so spectacularly unlicensed, and this needs to change.
Yours,
Brion Toss