Two prusiks, as I have offered is not in the realm of the unthinkable, nor are they so complicated that one can not inspect them easily.
No... but just COUNT the number of tucks and/or spins !
When you go over 2, you return to your drawing board - until
all really easy-to-tie AND simple topologically and/or geometrically knots are exhausted. A fishing or decorative knot can be very nice, as you know, and, of course, very secure. Nobody said that such a knot is difficult to learn or remember, or that it will not work, but that is not what we need ! Most, if not all, convoluted enough fishing knots are easy to remember ( as they are relying on mere addition /repetition of spins, mainly =
spin-spin-spin-, etc... ) and they
will work, just because they
are meant to work, they are designed to work on very slippery fishing lines, Spectra / Dyneema included.
I do not put
limitations, and I had often been criticized for tying too complex knots !
I just suggest to start from the simple and proceed to the more complex, because we are looking for the simpler, or one of the simpler, knots that will work, not
any, however convoluted tangle, that works... If you are just hungry, before you go fishing, see if there is any fish already cooked in your refrigerator.