How about the vice-versa? How did that fare?
I tied the Vice-Versa and my two angler's loop knots bend inline with each other in Amsteel Blue and put it on my bench winch this morning. The Vice-Versa slipped at relatively low tension.
I dare say that with HMPE one must be more selective
at what knots to test : why should anyone think that
vice versa would succeed when much more *entangled*
knots have not?! (Btw, this knot is an asymmetricly loaded
reever bend which was introduced by Wright & Magowan's
1928 Alpine Journal article.)
NautiKnots, ...
I'd like to see what you find in testing of that.
...
It held pretty well (up until the angler's loop knots began showing signs of strain) and then it rolled off its tails.
Thanks much, and ... egadz. Well, it slipped for EStar, too.
But, my, all those tucks & turns ... !! ?!
I have one other ides, aiming for something simpler
--bereft "all those tucks & turns"--, trying to pinpoint
some aspect of security that can endure!
Consider the venerable
fisherman's knot ("single"),
as show here:
https://outdoors.stackexchange.com/questions/7342/which-is-better-a-single-fishermans-knot-or-a-double/16556#16556CONTINUE from the finished/3rd state shown in the top image
of 3 stages of the knot by
(well, firstly, loosening each
overhand enough
to open a bit of space in each SPart's turn,
anticipating the tuck ...
taking the left/green tail around back & diagonally upwards
--and red tail going opposite, also around back, diagonally
downwards-- to tuck out in those anticipating gaps of each
SPart's initial turn.
(The olive & red pass each other adjacent, olive above, red below.)
The point of this is to put what ought to be the greated
nipping force --of the SPart's initial turn (in this knot, anyway!)--
against the tail,
and then still there is the other nipping done by the
overhandcomponents being pressed together and all.
The tail is alone in being crunched --no parallel part to shield
it from forces (in contrast to my doubly tucked tails in that
like-#1452 knot).
Does it help?
(It's hard to get a grip on what bedeviling behavior comes
from (thin?) HMPE !! Though I must remind myself that I'd
5 eye knots tested in 5/32" 12-strand Dyneema (coated, IIRC),
and all held to rupture, not slipping.
(Hmmm, looking at the knot in hand, I see that were one
to load it
in reverse (i.e., load tails) it would be
a bowlinesque structure doing similar concentrated nipping;
though its turns look shaper and so ... weaker?)
Cheers, and good wishes for your test bed (maybe looking
for reinforcement!)
--dl*
====