@ Sweeney,
Thank you so much for giving the content providers the structure they have requested.
The power of a Global Moderator - does it give you goosebumps?
As this is a reply to your board introduction, I hope you will allow it to remain, in view of the fact that it violates some of the 'promptly removed' rules that you have imposed, but I post it in the hope of attaining understanding and clarity.
So, some questions if I may :-
We asked for a board on which we could post issues relating to testing, results and reviews. One of the topics we intend to cover is the development of a Testing Protocol. This does not conform to your restrictions, will it be 'promptly removed'?
We intend to reference guidance notes and methodology produced by other bodies as background to the development of our protocol. This does not conform to your restrictions, will they be 'promptly removed'?
We intend to review knot books by others. This does not conform to your restrictions, will they be 'promptly removed'?
When reviewing a test report, inevitably discussion will cover the suitability of the testing for a specific knot, or the suitability of that knot for the applied testing, likewise, the review will likely advise alternate testing or knots. This does not conform to your restrictions, will it be 'promptly removed'?
Testing is aimed at improving our understanding of knots, this is often achieved by comparing knots with differing characteristics, these alternate structures would be brought into the reviews. This does not conform to your restrictions, will it be 'promptly removed'?
Finally I would seek clarification on your rules regarding 'Denigrating Comments' and links needing to be 'Truly Germane'. These are personally subjective. Could you please give us clear guidance as to the tests you will apply before they fail to conform to your restrictions and are 'promptly removed'
Derek